Banca de QUALIFICAÇÃO: ROSELY ANTONIO DA SILVA PEREIRA

REREADING DURING COLLABORATIVE TEXT PRODUCTION OF NEWLY LITERATE STUDENTS

Rereading, Revision, Text production, Literacy, School Manuscript.

Rereading during textual production is a recursive action typical of writing, which seems to involve a double function: on the one hand, recovering in working memory what is being written to ensure coherence and phrasal and textual unity in the continuity of what will be written and, on the other hand, alter what has already been written, recognizing, in what was recorded on the graphic support, problems of different linguistic orders. This double function of re-reading, when the writer identifies some type of problem, can change what has already been written or change what will still be written, characterizing itself as a textual revision action. This study, through the use of the Ramos System, a data collection method capable of recording the manuscript under construction, intends to analyze the rereading actions carried out by newly literate writing students. Using the synchronized film generated by the Ramos System, we identified, quantified and analyzed the exact moments in which students interrupted the flow of writing and reread what they had already linearized. Our analysis material consists of 03 (three) collaborative textual production processes, in which dyads of students should write invented stories. The material was collected in a classroom of students in the 2nd and 4th year of elementary school. 96 re-reading points were identified, an average of 32 re-reads per manuscript under construction. We classify rereading actions into four types: 1. Silent rereading action, identified through the direction of gaze and movements of hands and pens; 2. Action of rereading it out loud, to yourself; 3. Action of rereading aloud to the partner; 4. Rereading action at the teacher’s request. Among the re-reading actions, we observed that one of the students in the dyad carried out more re-reading followed by changes to what he had already written. These changes implied changes or erased spelling and grammatical aspects of the text.