THE BNC-TRAINING DISCOURSE: progress or setback in the process of training basic education teachers?
Discourse. Basic education. Teacher training. BNC-Training. BNCC-Basic Education.
The general objective of this work is to contribute to a critical interpretation of the reform of basic education teacher training courses, through analysis of the discourse materialized in the proposal of the Common National Base for the Initial Training of Basic Education Teachers (BNC-Training) seeking understand whether the regulations can be considered an advance or a setback. To this end, we will use the theoretical-methodological assumptions of Discourse Analysis (DA) founded by Michel Pêcheux, anchored in historical-dialectic materialism. This methodology is extremely relevant, as it understands that there is no possibility of neutral discourse; every discourse is governed by an ideological perspective, since when producing a discourse, the subject does so from a social place, placing their values, beliefs, their way of seeing and living the world. Therefore, when materializing a speech in a document like this one from BNC-Training, the subject does so with intentionality. The aforementioned document was prepared in an office before the pandemic, without any type of popular participation and mainly without participatory discussion by teachers, coordinators and managers, that is, those who are on the school floor, experiencing the problems faced by basic education every day. . We understand, therefore, that it is necessary to remain attentive to the discourse present there and understand the repercussions it causes for Initial Teacher Training, when following its implementation process and curricular changes in university courses for teacher training. This research becomes necessary to carry out a critical reading of this document, different from what is presented by the official discourse of the subjects who created it, the Ministry of Education (MEC) and the National Education Council (CNE), who tell us that BNC-Training is necessary to assist BNCC-Basic Education in the significant advances to be made for Brazilian education. Pursuing our objective and in accordance with the methodology, we will discuss the social function of Brazilian education, in addition to understanding the set of reforms that enabled the construction of this document. We will use as a theoretical reference regarding education: BRANDÃO (2007); FRIGOTTO (2018); MANACORDA (1997); LAVOURA et.al. (2020); SAVIANI (2007); between others. Regarding AD, we will work with AMARAL (2005); PÊCHEUX (2014); COURTINE (2009); ORLANDI (2015); FLORÊNCIO et. al. (2009), among others.