The praxis of psychoanalysis between the subject of medieval invention and the subject of the unconscious.
Lacanian Psychoanalysis, Subject, Science.
When discussing the relationship between psychoanalysis and science, it's common to establish a separation of both. However, in Science and Truth, Lacan points out that psychoanalysis praxis doesn't imply another subject than that of science. In this saying, it becomes a Lacanian axiom. Lacan not only weaves a relationship between psychoanalysis and science but also says that both subjects are only one, but what allowed Lacan to say the psychoanalysis subject is the subject of science? And what science does he refer to? Thus, the question arises about which notion of subject and science Lacan referred to in this statement, as it is not enough to just reproduce it by making it a simple aphorism, because what is understood as science and subject directly affect the constitution of psychoanalysis praxis. The research begins with Koyré's study of the origins and constitution of scientific thought and, therefore, makes use of this author's thesis that modern science is, in fact, a medieval invention, based on Aristotelianism and medieval Platonism. It begins with Koyré in order to introduce the discussion in Lacan about science and the subject, as well as the relationship between the subject of science and the subject of psychoanalysis, or the unconscious.